USPTO serial 74410433
HIGH END SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1940372Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 12, 1995
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HIGH END SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stuart J. Friedman
STUART J FRIEDMAN SIXBEY, FRIELMAN, LEEDOM AND FERGUSON2010 CORPORATE RIDGE STE 600MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | smoke generating fluid for use with professional fog machines for producing a hygienically safe smoke/fog medium for entertainment lighting, theatrical lighting, fire safety training and industrial testing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 1994 |
| 007 | professional smoke/fog generator for producing a smoke/fog medium | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 1994 |
| 009 | electronic control apparatus for controlling electrical lighting fixtures | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 1994 |
| 011 | electrical light sources for stage, concert, theatrical, studio and nightclub applications; multiple beam light fixtures; microprocessor controlled lamps and flashlamps; laser light simulator comprising electric light fixtures and electronic controller; heat exchanger module for cooling chemical smoke; dichroic filters for lighting | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 29, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HIGH END SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by High End Systems Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by High End Systems Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named HIGH END SYSTEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2002 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 19, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 1995 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 7, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 7, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 25, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 27, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 2, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 4, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |