USPTO serial 74411130
WORKZONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WORKZONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CRITERION MANUFACTURING LIMITED
East Tamaki, Auckland, NZ
CRITERION MANUFACTURING LIMITED
East Tamaki, Auckland, NZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Clarke Holman
JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN JACOBSON, PRICE, HOLMAN & STERN400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | furniture | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 5, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 5, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 31, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |