USPTO serial 74411339
ONE FOR THE THUMB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONE FOR THE THUMB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna A. Tobin
DONNA A TOBIN COOPER & DUNHAM1185 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | men's, women's and children's clothing and accessories; namely, T-shirts, sweatshirts, shorts, sweat pants, jackets, bathing suits, caps, hats, scarfs and socks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Schechner, Bruce R.
- Other trademarks owned by Schechner, Bruce R.
- Other trademarks owned by Diamond, Jonathan J.
- Other trademarks owned by Diamond, Jonathan J.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ONE FOR THE THUMB
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 4, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 28, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 22, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |