USPTO serial 74411652
DYNAMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DYNAMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PHILIP A JONES
PHILIP A JONES BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | power tools, namely electric screw drivers; electric drills; electric polishers; electric ratchets; electric grinders; electric grinding wheels; electric impact wrenches; electric engravers; electric drills; pneumatic nailing guns; hand-held power saws; drilling machines; milling machines; grinding machines; hydraulic presses; and heavy-duty table saws | ABANDONED | — |
| 008 | hand tools, namely hammers; iron hammers; mallets; monkey wrenches; pliers; screw drivers; scissors; knives; sharpeners for blades, saws, wheels, and axes; saws; files; chisels; planers; sanders; grinding tools for automotive wheels and automotive body paint; scrapers; nippers; pinchers; carpenter's squares; soldering irons; engravers; square drives in the nature of ratchet wrenches, T-bars, speeders, break bars, torque wrenches and other multi-sided drive wrenches; crow bars; stud installers and removers for automotive body and upholstery work; pullers; taps and dies; and augers; as well as extension bars and T-bars for all hand tools | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROBERTS TOOL INTERNATIONAL (USA), INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ROBERTS TOOL INTERNATIONAL (USA), INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named DYNAMO
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 27, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 30, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1996 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 1996 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 1996 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 12, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 19, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 4, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |