Drawing for DEWIE, DICKUM & HOWE

USPTO serial 74411812

DEWIE, DICKUM & HOWE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEWIE, DICKUM & HOWE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. W. Gipple

J W GIPPLE GIPPLE & HALE6667-B OLD DOMINION DRMCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016paper, paper articles and printed matter; namely, stationery and business cardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 29, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 30, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 31, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 24, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 24, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 11, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 16, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 12, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 1998SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 28, 1997IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 27, 1997EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 27, 1997EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 17, 1997EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 27, 1996EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 11, 1996EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 28, 1996EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 28, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 1, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 23, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 16, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 11, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 8, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 29, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance