USPTO serial 74411812
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Cockeysville, MD
Cockeysville, MD
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. W. Gipple
J W GIPPLE GIPPLE & HALE6667-B OLD DOMINION DRMCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | paper, paper articles and printed matter; namely, stationery and business cards | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 30, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 31, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 24, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 28, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 1, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 11, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |