Drawing for HOECHST

USPTO serial 74411900

HOECHST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOECHST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William F. Lawrence

WILLIAM F LAWRENCE CURTIS, MORRIS & SAFFORD, PC530 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017plastics; namely, plastic film and sheet and microporous film and hollow fibers, for general industrial useABANDONED
022synthetic fibers and filaments, such as acetate stapleABANDONED
023yarn, such as acetate yarnABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 2, 1997ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 2, 1997EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Dec 10, 1996EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Nov 2, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Sep 6, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 23, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 23, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 6, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 11, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 20, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance