Drawing for ROYAL PALACE

USPTO serial 74412461

ROYAL PALACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROYAL PALACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD L. MYERS

RICHARD L MYERS910 CALLE NEGOCIO,STE 280SAN CLEMENTE, CA 92673-6201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020drapesABANDONEDJun 30, 1992
024textile goods; namely, tablecloths, place mats, napkins, table runnersABANDONEDJun 30, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 29, 1995EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Aug 22, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
May 30, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
May 16, 1995JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 16, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 27, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 29, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 13, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance