USPTO serial 74412660
BIOGEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, CHERYL A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIOGEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BIODERMA SKIN ENRICHMENTS PRODUCTS LIMITED
Etobicoke, Ontario M8Z 2T2, CA
Other trademarks owned by BIODERMA SKIN ENRICHMENTS PRODUCTS LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas S.Johnson
DOUGLAS S JOHNSON DENNISON ASSOCIATES133 RICHMOND ST W STE 301TORONTO, ON M5H 2L7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | body and skin care products, namely day and night cream skin gels, neck creams and hand creams, face creams, body creams, breast creams, massage and foot creams, skin tonic, anti-wrinkle eye cream, facial scrub, facial masks, facial peel, facial stripping preparation, facial cleansing emulsion, make-up remover, face moisturizers and lotions, hair removing cream and wax, bath oils, skin toner, foundation make-up, personal deodorant, make-up, nail care preparations, namely cuticle softener, nail hardeners, essential oil for use on the eyelashes, non-medicated sun tanning lotion, hair shampoo, hair conditioner | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |