USPTO serial 74413101
OZONELTHERAPY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OZONELTHERAPY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Etobicoke, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas S. Johnson
DOUGLAS S JOHNSON DENNISON ASSOCIATES133 RICHMOND ST W STE 301TORONTO, ON M5H 2L7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | body and skin care products, namely skin care and hair care gels, skin creams, namely day and night creams, neck, hand, face, body, breast, massage and foot creams; skin and hair tonics; wrinkle and eye cream, facial wash, face masks, peels, and astringents, skin cleansing emulsion, make-up remover, moisturizers and lotions; body oil and body wax removers, bath oils, toner, exfoliating liquids, skin and hair neutralizers, eleastic skin creams, foundation, deodorant, make-up, nail care preparation, namely cuticle softener, nail hardeners; lash oils; tanning oils; hair care products, namely shampoo, conditioner and setting gels | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | body and skin care services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |