USPTO serial 74413168
RE-MARKABLE VIDEO TAPE MARKING SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RE-MARKABLE VIDEO TAPE MARKING SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Herzliya Pituach 46733, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Francis J. Duffin
FRANCIS J DUFFIN DARBY & DARBY PC805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | marking system comprising a self-contained opaque screen sketching device and pen used in connection therewith for use in labeling video tapes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 29, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 14, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 10, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 24, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 9, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1993 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |