USPTO serial 74413263
DEMOS BASTING BAR-B-Q SEASONING SAUCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEMOS BASTING BAR-B-Q SEASONING SAUCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wetumpka, AL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Veal
ROBERT J VEAL VEAL & ASSOCIATES2001 PARK PL N STE 525BIRMINGHAM, AL 35203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | blasting, bar-b-q and seasoning sauce sold through retail grocery store outlets | ABANDONED | Feb 15, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 1, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 1, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 21, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 18, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |