Drawing for LINK

USPTO serial 74413491

LINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin J. McDevitt

KEVIN J MCDEVITT WILLIAN BRINKS OLDS HOFER GILSON & LIONENBC TWR STE 3600455 N CITYFRONT PLZ DRCHICAGO, IL 60611-5599

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007power tools; namely, electric screw drivers, electric drills, electric polishers, electric ratchets, electric grinders, electric grinding wheels, electric impact wrenches, electric engravers, electric drills, pneumatic nailing guns, hand-held power saws drilling machines, milling machines, grinding machines, hydraulic presses, and heavyduty table sawsABANDONED—
008hand tools, namely, hammers, iron hammers, mallets, monkey wrenches, pliers, screw drivers, scissors, knives, sharpeners for blades, saws, wheels and axes, saws, files, chisels, planers, sanders, grinding tools for automotive wheels and automotive body work, scrapers, nippers, pinchers, carpenter's squares, soldering irons, engravers, and square drives in the nature of ratchet wrenches, T-bars, speeders, break bars, torque wrenches and the like and other polygonal drives, crow bars, taps and dies, and augers, as well as extension bars and T-bars for all hand toolsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 1997ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 1997DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 10, 1997DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 4, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 8, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 3, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 15, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 12, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 13, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 6, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 4, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance