Drawing for LA SANDWICHERIE

USPTO serial 74413944

LA SANDWICHERIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LA SANDWICHERIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lance W. Shinder

LANCE W SHINDER BARKET & SHINDER2935 SW 3RD AVEMIAMI, FL 33129UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042restaurant servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 1997PR.DPETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED—
Aug 8, 1997PRIMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED—
Nov 26, 1996PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 1996ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 24, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 22, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 1, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 1995CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 8, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance