USPTO serial 74414137
SHARED VIDEOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIFMAN, ARI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHARED VIDEOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank H. Andorka
FRANK H ANDORKA BAKER & HOSTETLER3200 NATIONAL CITY CTR1900 E 9TH STCLEVELAND, OH 44114-3485Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | prerecorded video tapes on the subjects of; family histories and genealogy; books and authors; travel and outdoor recreation; educational and entertainment materials directed at children; infant care and behavior; parenting; training, equipment, nutrition, and physical and psychological techniques relating to competitive sports; collectibles; home furnishings, home decoration, and architectural design; quilting, needlepoint, and other sewing activities; computers and audio and video equipment; aviation and meteorology; body building; weddings, honeymoons, and establishing a household; collector automobiles; scholarly commentary on a variety of subjects; humor; care, benefits of owning, and training of pets; and the use, manufacture, and maintenance of firearms | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 1997 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 1997 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 19, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 2, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |