USPTO serial 74414830
RISK BASED CLUSTER ANALYSIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 16, 1994
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RISK BASED CLUSTER ANALYSIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregg W. Emch
GREGG W EMCH EMCH, SCHAFFER, SCHAUB & PORCELLO COONE SEAGATE, STE 1980P O BOX 916TOLEDO, OH 43697-0916Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | technical consulting services in the field of risk determination, management and compliance relating to natural disasters in various geographic zones | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1994 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 29, 1994 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |