Drawing for BOULEVARD BY BLOCK

USPTO serial 74415901

BOULEVARD BY BLOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOULEVARD BY BLOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025collared shirts, T-shirts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, swim trunks, pants, sweaters and jacketsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 6, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 23, 1998EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 19, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 26, 1997REINREINSTATED—
Jun 20, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 1996ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 6, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 20, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 1996EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 22, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 22, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 9, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance