USPTO serial 74417557
NOISEBUSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NOISEBUSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lane Cove, NSW, 2066, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Tighe
THOMAS J TIGHE THOMAS J TIGHE & ASSOCIATESGOVERNOR PARK AT MONARCH COURT6265 GREENWICH DR STE 250SAN DIEGO, CA 92122-5917Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic noise suppression circuits and equipment for audio systems and special recognition systems comprised of headsets, telephones and speech synthesizers | ABANDONED | Sep 1, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1993 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 25, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |