Drawing for TREASURE ISLAND AT THE MIRAGE

USPTO serial 74417688

TREASURE ISLAND AT THE MIRAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1984421Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 2, 1996
Examiner
MAJOR, SCOTT J.
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TREASURE ISLAND AT THE MIRAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANA ROBINSON

MARK G. TRATOS QUIRK & TRATOS3773 HOWARD HUGHES PARKWAYSUITE 500 NORTHLAS VEGAS, NV 89109

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042hotel servicesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDNov 23, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2007C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Feb 7, 2007CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 25, 2007CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Jul 30, 20028.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jul 5, 2002PR23RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 15—
Jul 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2002PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Nov 15, 2001815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Nov 4, 1998PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 2, 1996R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 29, 1996CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Mar 4, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 1995SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 10, 1995IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 2, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 25, 1994ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 3, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 8, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 7, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance