USPTO serial 74418905
E LE PRINT EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E LE PRINT EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa M. DuRoss
E RUSSELL TARLETON GRAHAM & JAMES LLP/RIDDELL WILLIAMS PS1001 FOURTH AVE PLZ STE 4500SEATTLE, WA 98154-1065UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 1010684 Ontario Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 1010684 Ontario Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named E LE PRINT EXPRESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 21, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 20, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1994 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 11, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 1994 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jan 6, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |