USPTO serial 74420502
NO POWER TO DRUGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THAYER, GARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NO POWER TO DRUGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Henry M. Feiereisen
HENRY M FEIEREISEN ABOLD CORPORATION500 FIFTH AVESTE 1205NEW YORK, NY 10110Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | books, magazines, journals, newsletters, manuals, brochures and pamphlets in the field of education, information and development in connection with drug abuse, photographic prints, stationery, educational and school products, namely books in connection with drug abuse, printed and paper teaching materials and instructional materials in the field of drug abuse, playing cards; printed and paper sports memorabilia in the field of soccer, namely autograph cards and paper flags and banners | ABANDONED | Dec 18, 1993 |
| 018 | traveling luggage, tote bags and all purpose sports bags, duffel bags, handbags, valises, umbrellas | ABANDONED | Dec 18, 1993 |
| 025 | clothing and apparel, namely shirts, ties, neckties, stockings, jackets, trousers, pants, shorts, jeans, suits, blazers, socks, coats, overcoats, T-shirts, gowns, underwear, undershirts, underpants, sweaters, shoes, boots, slippers, bathing suits, bathing trunks, beach robes, belts, head wear, caps, head bands; sports apparel memorabilia in the field of soccer, namely caps and athletic uniforms | ABANDONED | Dec 18, 1993 |
| 028 | sports memorabilia comprising, signed soccer balls, in the fields of soccer; toys, games, and playthings, namely board games, jigsaw puzzles, stuffed toy animals and dolls, video game machines, computer game programs | ABANDONED | Dec 18, 1993 |
| 041 | educational services, namely conducting classes, seminars, conferences and workshops to dissuade people from using drugs and distributing course materials in connection therewith, videotape and videotape cassette production services, audiotape production services | ABANDONED | Dec 18, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Abold Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Abold Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named NO POWER TO DRUGS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 22, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 1, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |