Drawing for CHIPCORDER

USPTO serial 74420912

CHIPCORDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHIPCORDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sally M. Abel

SALLY M ABEL FENWICK & WTWO PALO ALTO SQ STE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028dolls; toys, namely children's and infants' multiple activity toys, battery-powered toys that contain recordable or pre-recorded messages in the nature of toy cellular telephones, toy telephones, toy pagers, toy message recorders, toy clocks, toy action figures, toy boxes, toy figures, toy mobiles, toy swords, toy vehicles, toys for dogs, cats and birds, infant action crib toys, non-riding transportation toys, party favors in the nature of small toys, plush toys, ride-on toys, stuffed toys, wind-up toys, and battery powered action toys; games, namely electronic video game machines and board games and manipulative type games for children and adults involving sound effects and/or containing a recordable or pre-recorded message on the game itself or on one of the related game pieces; Christmas ornaments and Easter ornamentsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 20, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 1998EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 21, 1998EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 31, 1997EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 1997EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 24, 1997EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 20, 1997EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 19, 1997EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 1996EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 19, 1996EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 21, 1996EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 21, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 29, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 28, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 30, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 11, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance