USPTO serial 74421648
ACUTRAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACUTRAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bossier City, LA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. Harrison
JOHN M HARRISON2139 E BERT KOUNSSHREVEPORT, LA 71105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for tracking compressed gas cylinders | ABANDONED | May 15, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 5, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 31, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 31, 1997 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 26, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 18, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |