Drawing for NATIONAL MED SECURITYCARE

USPTO serial 74421889

NATIONAL MED SECURITYCARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATIONAL MED SECURITYCARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LeRoy T. Rahn

LEROY T RAHN CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALEPOST OFFICE BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042medical servicesABANDONEDSep 20, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 5, 1995EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 28, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 23, 1995NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Mar 21, 1995JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 21, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 31, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 1993IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Dec 10, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 1993AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 15, 1993IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance