USPTO serial 74422043
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet E. Martinez
JANET E MARTINEZ COBB COLE & BELL150 MAGNOLIA AVEPOST OFFICE BOX 2491DAYTONA BEACH, FL 32115-2491| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | camshafts for producing mechanical motion in internal combustion engines for land vehicles, water craft, and aircraft; valve train components for internal combustion engines in land vehicles, watercraft and aircraft, namely valves, hydraulic and mechanical lifters, valve springs, spring retainers, guides valve locks, lash caps, pushrods, cylinder heads, timing chains, gears, steel aluminum and cast iron rocker arms, studs, nuts, valve train stabilizers, pushrod guideplates, cams, cam followers, distributor gears, balance shafts and vacuum canisters and hardware therefor; electronic ignition systems for internal combustion engines in land vehicles, watercraft, and aircraft, comprising ignition modules, ignition amplifiers, ignition coils, spark plug wires, and points, sold as a unit; points conversion kits comprised of brackets, optical triggers, and shutter wheels, sold as a unit; machine tools for use in engine testing, maintenance, and repair, namely oil pump primers, cam degreeing tool (used to degree the camshaft directly from the cam lobe), machining tool bodies including combination bodies combining the capabilities of the valve guide machining tool and spring seat machining tool, spring seat machining tool bodies, valve guide machining tool body, stud boss mill cutter, and machining tool arbors; replacement parts for the above-referenced goods | ABANDONED | Oct 19, 1993 |
| 009 | engine management computers, namely engine controllers, rev-limiters, programmable input/output devices, and voltage regulators; battery chargers; surge protectors; computer hardware and software for use in the field of land vehicle, marine, and aircraft engine testing, repair, engine control, and product selection; testing and tuning apparatus for land vehicles, water craft, and aircraft, namely degree wheels, degreeing bushings, precision dial indicators, and top dead center locators, pointer and checking springs, and tuneable computers for adjusting timing or adjusting fuel mixture; replacement parts for the above referenced goods | ABANDONED | Oct 19, 1993 |
| 017 | valve stem seals for use in internal combustion engines in land vehicles, water craft, and aircraft | ABANDONED | Oct 19, 1993 |
| 037 | land vehicle, marine, and aircraft engine repair and maintenance for others, namely regrinding and repair of camshafts for which replacement billets are unavailable | ABANDONED | Dec 1, 1993 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1995 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1994 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 23, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 28, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |