USPTO serial 74422354
DREAM PALACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DREAM PALACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES M MARMELSTEIN
CHARLES M MARMELSTEIN NOKAIDO MARMELSTEIN MURRAY & ORAMMETROPOLITAN SQ 655 15TH ST NWSTE 330 G ST LOBBYWASHINGTON, DC 20005-5701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toy houses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 9, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |