USPTO serial 74422650
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. David Wharton
STINSON TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATOR STINSON MORRISON HECKER LLP1201 WALNUT, STE 2800KANSAS CITY, MO 64106-2150UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | hand operated garden tools; namely, cultivator-weeders | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1993 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2002 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 9, 1995 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 24, 1995 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 1995 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 20, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 24, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |