Drawing for OPTI-PORT

USPTO serial 74422740

OPTI-PORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VLCEK, TOMAS V
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPTI-PORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. Beard

JOHN L BEARD MERCHANT, GOULD, SMITH, EDELL, ET AL3100 NORWEST CTR90 S SEVENTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010medical apparatus; namely, implantable access systems comprising a portal, a catheter and an access needleABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 1995ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 27, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 1994UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 1994UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 20, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance