Drawing for TULSA PIPELINE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY INC.

USPTO serial 74423252

TULSA PIPELINE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHILDRESS, J.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TULSA PIPELINE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark G. Kachigian

MARK G KACHIGIAN HEAD & JOHNSON228 W 17TH PLTULSA, OK 74119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007equipment for construction and repair of pipeline; namely, pipe bending machines; pipe bending dies and liners; hydraulic plug mandrels; pneumatic mandrels; hydraulic wedge mandrels; self-propelled hydraulic wedge mandrels; machine parts; namely, internal line-up clamps, pneumatic internal line-up clamps, double-jointed internal line-up clamps, external and external segment line-up clamps and hydraulic line-up clamps; cutting and beveling equipment for pipe mills, off-shore barges, stationary yards and right-of-way use; pipeline travel machines for cleaning, priming, coating and taping pipeline; machine parts; namely, pipeline kettles; machine parts; namely, belts, slings and cradles for lifting and supporting pipeline; road boring augers; and earth boring augersABANDONEDJun 28, 1993
040equipment for construction and repair of pipeline, namely pipe bending machines and parts therefor, namely pipe bending dies; hydraulic plug mandrels; pneumatic mandrels; hydraulic wedge mandrels; self-propelled hydraulic wedge mandrels; internal line-up clamps, pneumatic, manual and hydraulic internal line-up clamps, double-jointed internal line-up clamps; cutting and beveling machines for pipe mills, off-shore barges, stationary yards and right-of-way use, and parts therefor, namely hydraulic power units, pipeline travel machines for cleaning, priming, coating and taping pipeline; road boring augers; and earth boring augersABANDONEDJun 28, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 1995ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 27, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 1, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance