Drawing for COMPLETE COLLECTION

USPTO serial 74423630

COMPLETE COLLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACK, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMPLETE COLLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert A. Vanderhye

ROBERT A VANDERHYE NIXON & VANDERHYE PC1100 N GLEBE RD 8TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22201-4714UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009pre-recorded computer programs for imaging laser stationeryABANDONED—
016laser stationery and instructional booklets related to computer controlled imaging of laser stationeryABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 20, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 20, 1995EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 3, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 15, 1995JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 22, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 28, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 16, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 1994IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jun 14, 1994AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 24, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 1994IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 10, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance