Drawing for DIRECT ELECT

USPTO serial 74423675

DIRECT ELECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIFMAN, ARI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DIRECT ELECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory H. Guillot

GREGORY H GUILLOT GUILLOT & GAZALA, LLP1660 L ST NW STE 316WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038telecommunications services, namely providing access by means of telephone lines and a computer, to an automated voice response system, which provides subscribers with insurance, retirement, and other benefit informationABANDONEDAug 4, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 1997ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 13, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 1996SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 16, 1996EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 1996PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 5, 1996PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 1996ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 1996IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 11, 1996EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 11, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 18, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 17, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 1, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 1, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 8, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 22, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 13, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance