USPTO serial 74423828
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas P. Arden
THOMAS P ARDEN MCBRIDE, BAKER & COLES40TH FL500 W MADISON STCHICAGO, IL 60661-2511| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing; namely, shorts, gloves, hats, caps, boots, shoes, skirts, underwear, pajamas, belts, chaps, socks, scarves, suspenders, sweaters, rain suits, mittens and neck ties | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 19, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 22, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 7, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 14, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 15, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 29, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1995 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 6, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 14, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |