USPTO serial 74424099
SOS HELP!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOS HELP!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hertfordshire EN6 3LX, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Bruce Prout
D BRUCE PROUT CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALEPOST OFFICE BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |