USPTO serial 74424233
AEON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AEON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Berne S. Broadbent
BERNE S BROADBENT850 KEY BANK TWR50 S MAIN STSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84144Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin lotions; skin cleansing lotions; skin moisturizers; skin soaps; skin toners; skin emollients; skin creams; skin cleansing creams; skin clarifiers; body lotions body creams; and night creams | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 23, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 6, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 21, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 25, 1994 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 29, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |