USPTO serial 74424939
QUEST YOUR BEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUEST YOUR BEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Christopher Cuneo
J CHRISTOPHER CUNEO LOMMEN, NELSON, COLE AND STAGEBERG1800 IDS CTRMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | posters, prints, lithographs, and books dealing with human motivation | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | mail order and catalog services in the field of posters, prints, lithographs, books, audiotapes, videotapes, artwork, T-shirts, electronic equipment, games, toys, awards, and novelty items | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 10, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 1994 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |