USPTO serial 74425298
OVEN TENDER CHICKEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, DARREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OVEN TENDER CHICKEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda A. Heban
MARY LOUISE RYAN KRAFT GENERAL FOODS, INCLAW DEPT - NF356THREE LAKES DRNORTHFIELD, IL 60093Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | sauces | ABANDONED | Jan 7, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 1996 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jun 7, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 18, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 5, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |