USPTO serial 74425700
ECOSCHOOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECOSCHOOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London W11 4EY, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Sacoff
ROBERT W SACOFF PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, ET AL320 WATERGATE SIX HUNDREDWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | sets for testing the quality, composition and potential toxicity of inside and outside environments, including water, ambient air, furnishings and building materials, such kits comprising testing apparatus, test tubes, pipettes, breakers, pots and saucers, measuring cylinders, chemicals, seed packets, labels, posters, worksheets, charts and instructional materials; namely, leaflets and pamphlets all sold as a unit | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1996 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 29, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |