Drawing for PROLINE SERIES

USPTO serial 74425722

PROLINE SERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WONG, CONRAD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROLINE SERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert E. Wagner

ROBERT E WAGNER C/O WALLENSTEIN, WAGNER & HATTIS, LTD53RD FL 311 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-6604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011brass plumbing valves, namely sill cocks, bibbs, traps, stops, stop and waste valves, and boiler drain valves for residential useABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 21, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 10, 1996CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 6, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 1996EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 8, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 14, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance