USPTO serial 74425921
ROBOT FLOWER SITTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SZOKE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROBOT FLOWER SITTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morgan L. Fitch, Jr.
MORGAN L FITCH JR FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERYSTE 900135 S LA SALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60603-4277Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic watering machine for the unattended, automatic watering of plants, flowers and seeds | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 1997 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 31, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 30, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 7, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 3, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |