USPTO serial 74426560
VIRTUAL DESIGN ENVIRONMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUNN, ELIZABETH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIRTUAL DESIGN ENVIRONMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Woodlands, Almondsbury, Bristol, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly Buck Richard
MOLLY BUCK RICHARD STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP4300 NATIONSBANK PLZ901 MAIN STDALLAS, TX 75202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images, namely, audio and video tape or disk players or recorders; blank recording video or audio disks; computers; computer software for developing virtual reality applications, simulations, and visualizations; computer memory; computer operating programs; optical data media, namely, blank optical disks; computer terminals; visual display units, namely, video screens and computer monitors; computer disk drives; microprocessors; integrated circuits; printed circuit boards; sensors for generating signals in response to movements of the human body; apparatus for applying stimuli to the body in response to computer generated signals; and replacement parts for all the foregoing goods | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |