Drawing for FUTURE STEP TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 74427366

FUTURE STEP TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAXLEY,ANDREW P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FUTURE STEP TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norm D. St. Landau

TUCKER, FLYER & LEWIS NORM D ST LANDAUSTE 4001615 L ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002interior paintABANDONED—
008carpet attachment systems, namely tools for the installation of carpets, namely rollers, cutters, seaming tools and knives; and carpet bordersABANDONED—
017carpet attachment backing and carpet installation tapeABANDONED—
027carpet, carpet undercushion, vinyl floor coverings, scatter rugs, bath rugs, rugs and bathroom accessories, namely toilet contour floor mats and bath mats, wall coveringsABANDONED—
037carpet installation servicesABANDONED—
042wholesale and retail store services in the field of rugs, carpets and floor coverings; wholesale distributorship services in the field of rugs, carpets and floor coverings; interior decorating services and interior decorating consulting servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 1999ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 1999UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 21, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 1998CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 23, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 5, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 1997CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 2, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 6, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 1996CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 15, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 13, 1996ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 22, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 1996IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jul 11, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 18, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 17, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 28, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 1994UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance