USPTO serial 74427677
NATURE HOUSE THE WISE CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHUNG, SARAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NATURE HOUSE THE WISE CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David B. Palley
DAVID B PALLEY103 PROVIDENCE MINE RD STE 204NEVADA CITY, CA 95959UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | prefabricated homes or buildings delivered in kits from which may be assembled the exterior shells of any of the following - single family dwellings, light commercial buildings, vacation cabins, starter homes, rental homes, office buildings, storage structures, equipment shelters, tract ho mes, apartment buildings, condominiums, and warehouse buildings | ABANDONED | May 7, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |