USPTO serial 74428036
VIDEO SENTINEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIDEO SENTINEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lambertville, NJ
Lambertville, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory M. Howison
GREGORY M HOWISON THOMPSON & HOWISON, LLPSTE 99512225 GREENVILLE AVEDALLAS, TX 75243Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | security systems comprising a video camera in combination with a video recorder to allow monitoring activity from a remote location | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 29, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 12, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |