USPTO serial 74428057
MODIFIER CAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MODIFIER CAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, M5W 1G5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIMOTHY H HIEBERT
TIMOTHY H HIEBERT SAMUELS GAUTHIER STEVENS & REPPERT225 FRANKLIN ST STE 3300BOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | strontium-aluminum alloys of various forms and chemistries which are used as an alloying agent in aluminum alloys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |