USPTO serial 74428299
HOLODECK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOLODECK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Yarmouth Port, MA
Yarmouth Port, MA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | 3D display apparatus comprising an optical scanner, a collimating device and a video monitor for use in a variety of fields including medicine, science and education | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1998 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 1998 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1998 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1997 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |