USPTO serial 74428730
PRODIGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PESKA, KEVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRODIGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cathcart, Glasgow G44 4EX, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel W. Sixbey
DANIEL W SIXBEY SIXBEY, FRIEDMAN, LEEDOM & FERGUSON, PC2010 CORPORATE RIDGE STE 600MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software and programs for use in the provision of financial planning and business management information; apparatus, namely information-loaded and blank magnetic tapes and discs for the storage, retrieval and processing of information; parts for the aforesaid goods | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 19, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 19, 1996 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 1, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 10, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 1994 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Dec 29, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |