Drawing for LIP DEFENSE

USPTO serial 74429949

LIP DEFENSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIP DEFENSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norm D. St. Landau

CHRISTA M COLE CALIFORNIA TAN INC10877 WILSHIRE BLVD 12TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90024UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003non-medicated lip balmABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 1995ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 25, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 1995UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 31, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 24, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance