Drawing for FRISCO BURGER

USPTO serial 74430171

FRISCO BURGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FRISCO BURGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary B. Scott

MARY B SCOTT SMALL, LARKIN, & KIDDE10940 WILSHIRE BLVD 18TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90024UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043restaurant services, wherein applicant provides sandwiches, including, but not limited to sandwiches with hamburger, garnishes and breadACTIVEMay 6, 1983

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 11, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 17, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 20, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 1996CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 14, 1995CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 2, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 29, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance