USPTO serial 74431531
MMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 23, 2004
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WEST LEBANON, NH
Hanover, NH
Hanover, NH
WEST LEBANON, NH
WEST LEBANON, NH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Pandiscio
MARK J PANDISCIO PANDISCIO & PANDISCIO470 TOTTEN POND RDWALTHAM, MA 02445UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | COMPUTER-BASED ENDOSCOPIC VIEW VIRTUAL REALITY IMAGING SYSTEM COMPRISED OF COMPUTER MODEL OF SITE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by A-VIEW CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Medical Media Systems
- Other trademarks owned by Medical Media Systems
- Other trademarks owned by A-VIEW CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by A-VIEW CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named MMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 24, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 5, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |