Drawing for MR. PEANUT

USPTO serial 74431847

MR. PEANUT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRIEDMAN, RICHARD A.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MR. PEANUT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven H. Hartman

STEVEN H HARTMAN NABISCO, INCP O BOX 311PARSIPPANY, NJ 07054-0311UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029processed edible sunflower seedsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 1995ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 22, 1994NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 30, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 29, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 21, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance