USPTO serial 74432422
TUG BOAT BABY FLOAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 2, 1996
- Examiner
- WEBER, BRIAN W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TUG BOAT BABY FLOAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
El Segundo, CA
San Francisco, CA
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
El Segundo, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KIMBERLY A CHASTEEN
KIMBERLY A CHASTEEN WILLIAMS MULLEN CLARK & DABBINS520 S W YAMHILL ST STE 200ONE OLD OYSTER POINT RD STE 210NEWPORT NEWS, VA 23602Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | children's floating pool seats for recreational use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 12, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MATTEL POWER WHEELS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by KRANSCO
- Other trademarks owned by SWIMWAYS CORP
- Other trademarks owned by MATTEL POWER WHEELS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named TUG BOAT BABY FLOAT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2002 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 25, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 1996 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 15, 1996 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 1, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |